News Not Worth Talking About

    • Moderator
    • 2627 posts
    June 29, 2008 1:02 PM BST


    FLINT, Michigan -- The city's new police chief is saying no to crack.Flint Journal Poll:
    Flint's new police chief is going to have officers arrest people wearing saggy pants that expose their butt cracks, your thoughts? Great idea, I hate those droopy drawers Stupid idea, don't they have more serious crimes to pursue? Created on Jun 27, 2008
    View Results


    Acting Flint Police Chief David R. Dicks announced Thursday that officers will begin arresting people wearing pants or shorts that sag too low exposing rear ends.

    "This immoral self expression goes beyond free speech," said Dicks in a statement released Thursday. "It rises to the crime of indecent exposure/disorderly persons."

    It's a style that irks many -- a few cities nationwide have banned the rear-revealing pants -- but the order also raises serious questions about how it would be enforced, if it disproportionately targets young black men and if ultra-low riders should be considered Constitutionally protected.

    So, is Dicks going too far?

    Greg Gibbs, an ACLU attorney in Flint, said how people wear their clothing is a form of expression but cautions that not all of those forms are protected by the Constitution.

    "The issue is: Does it violate the First Amendment?" said Gibbs, adding he plans to research the issue further.

    Some Flint residents are all for busting those who go bottoms out.

    "It's overdue," said Sam Berry, 73, of Flint.

    Gwendolyn R. Allen, 72, of Flint agreed.

    "It's so disgusting ... It's disgraceful."

    Claude Carter, 49, of Flint sees the issue differently though. He said wearing pants in that manner is a fad -- not a crime.

    "I see young and old wearing their pants that way," said Carter. "It doesn't annoy me."

    The crackdown on buttocks is an apparent response to "significant" complaints from citizens, according to Dicks.

    Under the chief's orders, any sworn officer who sees "sagging/exposing buttocks" will have probable cause to make an arrest under the city's disorderly person ordinance -- a misdemeanor punishable by a $500 fine and three months in jail.

    Flint NAACP President Frances Gilcreast is no fan of the style but worries about police focusing on a fashion favored by young black men.

    "I'm not interested in looking at anyone's underwear," said Gilcreast. "My concern is how (the policy) will be applied equitably."

    Some Flint police officers, however, aren't too sure how they will enforce it.

    "What about plumber's crack?" said Keith Speer, president of the Flint Police Officers Association.

    In the past, Speer said officers would issue warnings if too much skin was showing but reserved the handcuffs for full moons.

    "Most of the time, if they're wearing sagging pants they're also wearing boxers," said Speer.

    Memo notwithstanding, Speer doesn't expect any big changes in how officers handle the issue.

    "It's like issuing a memo telling officers to enforce the law," said Speer. "Are we going to get a memo every time somebody complains?"
    • Moderator
    • 2627 posts
    July 4, 2008 2:37 PM BST
    Imagine falling asleep, having sex, and not remembering a thing. You have no clue that you have sexually expressed yourself. You can’t recall any pleasurable effects. You don’t know that you suffer from this sleep oddity until a partner says something — until you’re awakened with a good slap. Or, in the worst-case scenario, somebody presses charges against you.

    Misunderstood and under-recognized, it is only recently that sleep disorders involving sex have received proper attention. These conditions cause the sleeper — and any partner — distress, and they can have legal ramifications. Forensic consequences are common.

    There are at least 11 different sex-related sleep disorders that are classified as “sexsomnia,” “sleep sex,” or “atypical sexual behavior during sleep.” People with sexsomnia unknowingly engage in a variety of sexual activities while they sleep. Reported behaviors include fondling, masturbation, initiating sex with a partner, sexual vocalizations, sexual assault and/or rape (including of one’s spouse), sleep exacerbation of persistent sexual arousal syndrome, ictal sexual hyperarousal and ictal orgasm. (“Ictal” is a physiological state like that of a seizure or stroke.)

    In a review of studies regarding behavioral sleep disorders that were published between 1950 and 2006, psychiatrist Carl Schenck and colleagues found that having another sleep disorder, like sleep terrors or sleepwalking, puts one at increased risk for sleep sex. Those with a history of sleep apnea, bedwetting and seizure disorders appear to be at greater risk for experiencing sexsomnia. Documented sleep sex clinical cases include:

    — A 34-year-old man who masturbated every night, after sleeping for two to three hours, despite having sex nightly with his wife before bedtime;

    — A 26-year-old woman who would talk erotically to her husband between the hours of 2 and 5 a.m. When he would respond positively, she would awaken and accuse him of forcing sex on her while she slept;

    — A husband who would grab his wife’s butt and grind up against her from behind while sleeping.

    Whether married, coupled or single, any case of sexsomnia involves the “no consent” issue of sex. Sleep invites the opportunity for the emergence of a person’s basic instincts — and ones that are released inappropriately at that. The court system, couples, and victims alike are all grappling with the issues of accountability and consequences for one’s actions while asleep.

    In February, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld an acquittal on sexual assault charges brought against a 35-year-old Toronto landscaper who tried to have sex with a woman at a party. Both had fallen asleep before the man attempted intercourse while in a state of sexsomnia (he had been drinking heavily that evening).

    While the Supreme Court of Canada had previously dealt with sleep-walking defenses, this was the first time the high court handled a sexsomnia defense. The court upheld the man's acquittal on the basis of “non-insane automatism.” Since his actions were without conscious control, like the beating of his heart, the court ruled that there was a lack of criminal intent, and therefore he couldn't be proven guilty of sexual assault.

    What makes sleep sex disorders even more perplexing and difficult to sort through is that they do not indicate psychological problems. The people who suffer from these disorders are otherwise psychologically healthy. However, if left untreated, these conditions increase an individual’s risk of developing a psychological problem, like depression.

    Sexsomnia itself can also take quite a toll on the sufferer, his or her partner and relationship(s). Partners may experience lesions and lacerations from more aggressive or forced sex. The sexsomniac may awaken with a bruised penis or fractured fingers. Both parties report feelings of bewilderment, embarrassment, shame, guilt, despair, shock, denial, annoyance, confusion, worry and fear.

    Other problems include feelings of:

    — A lack of emotional intimacy;

    — A sense of repulsion and sexual abandonment;

    — Self-incrimination in sexually expressing one’s self.

    Some partners of sexsomniacs do, however, report having more satisfying sex during these nightly romps, whether this involves a lover being:

    — More aggressive and dominant;

    — Kinkier;

    — More amorous;

    — Gentler;

    — More into satisfying his or her partner.

    Regardless, it is important for people with sexsomnia and their lovers to recognize sleep sex triggers. These tend to be physical contact with another person in bed, sleep deprivation, stress, and alcohol. As researchers learn more about these disorders, they are also finding that they can be treated with medication.