June 23, 2010 12:21 AM BST
I have one of these, I don’t think I can recommend it. Unlike similar products that use electric tweezers, this one runs off the mains, so it should have considerably more power than its battery-operated contemporaries. But I think the electric-tweezer method is basically flawed, no matter how much power you put through it. As you probably know, the tweezers deliver an electric current while gripping the hair, the conductive gel carries the current down the hair, but only as far as the skin; the gel cannot sufficiently get into the follicle to get the current there, so the follicle isn’t really targeted. Most of the gel will collect on the skin around the hair, when the current is applied the gel becomes caustic, burning the hair and any skin it’s in contact with, but not damaging the follicle.
I gave this machine a jolly good try but saw no improvement. I did manage to damage my skin by doing too many hairs close together in one session (all that gel turning caustic really is not good for your skin). All the hair grew back, the skin took weeks to heal where I’d damaged it. Do be careful if you try one of these!
I think there is a needle option available with the Vector but in this country a license is required to operate it. The point of the professional needle method (bad pun, sorry), is that the end of the needle gets just under the skin to precisely target the follicle, avoiding damage to the surrounding skin and indeed the need for the messy, fiddly, caustic gel. The quick burst of electricity kills the follicle. Unfortunately the tweezers method just doesn’t do this.
Needles kill follicles, tweezers don’t, not even electric ones.
xx
June 24, 2010 7:42 PM BST
quick burst of electricity?
5 seconds while the needle glows red hot and incinerates the follicle...and doing several close together results in a definite burn that takes a week to properly heal...but then the nice smooth patch feels great until other sleeping follicles push out their hair.