July 23, 2010 11:02 AM BST
The Secretary of State announced in the House of Commons on
12th January 2000 that "with effect from today, homosexuality will no longer be a bar to service in Britain's Armed Forces" and introduced a new Code of Conduct for the british armed forces based on a new "Service Test" of acceptable conduct,
The House of Lords held that as a matter of general law discrimination on grounds of "sexual orientation" (ie homosexuality) is not unlawful - see MacDonald v Advocate General for Scotland 2003 UKHL 34 House of Lords on 19th June 2003.
The emphasis on the ruling that discrimination was
NOT unlawful
However new rules were introduced with effect from
1st December 2003 to change this. They ensure that discrimination on grounds of "sexual orientation" is unlawful in an employment context save in special circumstances (see the Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003 SI 2003/1661 and see notes at Sex discrimination/homosexuals & transsexuals ).
Only reason I have reposted this and highlightened certain sections, was because several people said I was talking rubbish and the celebrations of a landmark change in the law and celebrations are WEF 2002.to me like most of the GRA and the EHRA until thety are ratified by the UK goverment basically wrong. And under
''The unless special circumstances'' appertain, is ambiguous and can be enforced at ay time. The Armed forcesw like the church, when it suits them, Under Military law, I have discovered a clause, Section 69 of the Army act, which is rather funny7, conduct contrary to the good order a breach of military discipline bringing the army into disrepute and any behavour contrary to such. So should imagine holding hands on trooping of the colour and kissing whilst in uniform would still be an offence.
July 24, 2010 1:11 AM BST
Many years ago when I was in the army Section 40 of Queens Regulations was a similarly worded clause. In essence if an "offence" was not covered in any other clause Section 40 was used.
July 24, 2010 4:26 AM BST
Homosexuals and Bisexuals have always been allowed to serve in the military, as long as they kept quiet about it!
Making something "against the law" doesn't mean it will somehow magically vanish.
I think it's great that gay people in the armed forces seem to be standing up for themselves.
July 24, 2010 4:26 AM BST
Homosexuals and Bisexuals have always been allowed to serve in the military, as long as they kept quiet about it!
Making something "against the law" doesn't mean it will somehow magically vanish.
I think it's great that gay people in the armed forces seem to be standing up for themselves.
July 24, 2010 8:26 PM BST
Janis .
I think you would find that to be untrue! you cannot use the word "always" in your statement , you can say now or recently but even today though it is suposedly accepted if you do a bit of research you will find cases of homophobia within the forces to the extent that a few have been discharged for there own safety using cover up reasons .
Julia .
July 25, 2010 7:01 AM BST
If you have a large group of people, say an Army or any branch of the forces, or even the people I was on the train to Edinburgh with on Friday, there is a very high probability that some of them are going to be gay.
There's a very high probability that some of them are going to be left handed, or have red hair, (extremely probable here!).
It's just a fact.
I reiterate that making something "against the law" does not make it magically disappear.
I'm sure there were gay soldiers in the Roman Legions and I'm sure there are gay soldiers serving their countries today.
July 25, 2010 8:16 AM BST
Hi Janis .
The fact that every where you go "there are" (not a high probability) some people are gay , has nothing to do with the statements your are making , we are in 2010 , you also say making something again,st the law dos,nt make it magically disappear , "its not again,st the law to be gay now" but i was in the past (not long ago) and many of hundreds if not thousands have died because they were gay serving in forces all over the world .When you read a story of a member of the armed forces killed in an accident with a fire arm or even so called friendly fire you don,t get to read about the fact that may have been gay .Soldiers have been killed by other service personel "because they were gay" . Homophobia exists everywhere even on your train and in large groups of one sex working together it comes out .
Please before adding to this do a little bit of research it won,t take long! and please just stop saying "it was not again,st the law" as it was , even though the law has changed life is not easy for any gay person in the forces unless you happen to be an officer .
Julia .
March 25, 2003 2:19 PM GMT
Stevie,
Here in Australia our armed forces let anyone in who will Defend the nation and it works fine.
I was in the army and i told only some people. Others are open about being gay and others are not so.
In jobs like infantry or other arms corps there remains some hotility, but there are those who have over come it. Most people don't give a s**t along as you do your job.
I think your military does your nation a great diservice by continueing to make it a point for discussion. Who cares if who they have sex with if they can defend their society! Remember all parts of a society will want to defend their country, and should be free to do so.
Fiona,
... in the trenches again... fighting for my rights... as a retired SOLDIER!
P.S. retired at 21, i'm only 23 now!
April 30, 2003 6:56 AM BST
Hi all
Here in Finland it is up to you...you can be released from the military service if you are diagnosted to be a ts. Especially of course, if you are already in transition.
Those who have passed the military service and transition after that can be removed to female corps in reserve. I am an officer in reserve myself and will take the matter with the military when I´m about to change my name and gender status.
hugs
Laura
That sounds logical.
July 20, 2003 4:59 AM BST
i think that anyone willing to fight for their country ,no matter if they are gay or whatever should b able to enter their armed forces love phylis anne